News

How engineering expertise and GIS create long-term value for owners

Across higher education campuses—and many other complex facilities—critical infrastructure information often lives in fragmented places: paper drawings, outdated digital files, and the institutional knowledge of long-tenured staff. While invaluable, this information is difficult to access, vulnerable to loss, and challenging to use as a foundation for long-term planning.

A recent infrastructure condition assessment and GIS implementation for Mercy University’s Westchester Campus in Dobbs Ferry, New York illustrates how pairing engineering expertise with geospatial technology can transform infrastructure data into a strategic, decision-support asset.

Rather than producing a standalone report, the project focused on creating a living system—one that supports daily operations today while laying the groundwork for future capital planning and master planning initiatives.

Establishing the value of GIS from the start

Early project conversations with campus stakeholders centered on goals, operational challenges, and long-term priorities. A key theme quickly emerged: the need for a centralized, accessible platform where infrastructure information could be preserved, organized, and easily updated over time.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) provided that foundation. By serving as a single repository for asset data, condition information, photographs, and legacy records, GIS shifts infrastructure knowledge from static documentation to a dynamic tool that can be accessed in the office, in the field, or during an emergency—on a phone, tablet, or desktop.

Just as importantly, introducing GIS early helped align the assessment effort with how the information would actually be used. This ensures the final deliverable supports real-world decision-making rather than sitting on a shelf.

Multidisciplinary field data collection with an engineering lens

Accurate data starts in the field. A multidisciplinary team of engineers conducted on-site investigations, with each utility system reviewed by professionals with direct technical expertise in that discipline.

The assessment included:

• Electrical
• Stormwater
• Potable water
• Sanitary sewer
• Heating
• Natural gas
• Telecommunications

Assets were physically located, inspected, and documented, with condition and accessibility information captured directly in the GIS database. This approach ensured that each system was evaluated consistently and with a clear understanding of performance, risk, and maintenance considerations.

Creating a clear baseline through standardized condition assessment

To support prioritization and long-term planning, surface-accessible assets were visually inspected and assigned standardized condition ratings. Inspection notes and photographs were linked directly to mapped assets, allowing users to view infrastructure condition spatially across the campus.

This established a clear baseline of infrastructure health—one that can be referenced over time to:

• Identify near-term repair needs
• Inform capital improvement planning
• Support utility master plans
• Track changes in condition as assets age or are rehabilitated

By embedding this information within GIS, condition data becomes immediately actionable rather than buried in a static report.

Enhancing visibility with 360-degree imagery

For underground infrastructure such as manholes and vaults, traditional photographs often fail to capture the full context of existing conditions. To address this, 360-degree imagery was used to create immersive visual records of these assets. When linked to GIS features, this imagery allows users to virtually “step into” an asset location without returning to the field—supporting internal reviews, coordination across departments, and more informed planning discussions.

Preserving institutional knowledge through legacy record integration

Field investigations were complemented by the collection and digitization of available record drawings and survey plans. Decades of paper-based documentation were scanned, georeferenced, and incorporated into the GIS database.

By combining historical records with current field data, the system now serves as a single source of truth for campus infrastructure—preserving institutional knowledge while making it far more accessible and usable for current and future staff.

Collaboration that keeps the focus on usability

Throughout the project, regular coordination meetings ensured alignment with campus needs and expectations. These touchpoints allowed assumptions to be validated, workflows refined, and interim deliverables reviewed with an emphasis on practicality.

The result was a system designed not just for engineers, but for the people who rely on infrastructure data every day.

From assessment to long-term strategy

The immediate value of the project was a comprehensive, organized view of campus infrastructure. The longer-term impact was even greater. With a reliable data foundation in place, Mercy University was able to move forward with utility master planning efforts for its electrical, water, and sanitary sewer systems.

This progression underscores a broader lesson for infrastructure owners: when GIS is introduced as a strategic platform—not just a mapping tool—it becomes a catalyst for better planning, stronger decision-making, and more effective long-term investments.

Key takeaway for infrastructure owners

Engineering assessments deliver the greatest value when they don’t end with a report. By integrating technical expertise with GIS from the outset, organizations can transform infrastructure data into a living resource—one that supports operations today and enables smarter planning for what comes next.